Review



geo gene expression omnibus scrna seq single cell rna sequencing strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing deg s  (Spatial Transcriptomics Inc)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 86

    Structured Review

    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc geo gene expression omnibus scrna seq single cell rna sequencing strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing deg s
    Geo Gene Expression Omnibus Scrna Seq Single Cell Rna Sequencing Strna Seq Spatial Transcriptomics Rna Sequencing Deg S, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/seq+strna/pm41612289-313-28-37
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    geo gene expression omnibus scrna seq single cell rna sequencing strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing deg s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Sequencing:

    Article Title: Novel cancer‐associated secretory cells and IL‐1β + macrophages as key players in early lung adenocarcinoma progression in female never‐smokers
    Article Snippet: .. Analyses included whole‐exome sequencing (WES) and whole‐transcriptome sequencing (WTS) ( n = 7), single‐cell RNA sequencing ( n = 4) and spatial transcriptomics ( n = 1, SMC‐19) (Figure ). ..

    Article Title: Histone Methyltransferase SETD1B Maintains Cancer Stem Cell Niche by Regulating the Crosstalk between CD24 and Surface Adhesion Molecules in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Article Snippet: .. Spatial Transcriptomics Spatial transcriptome sequencing data from the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA- Human: HRA000437) were accessed via the National Genomics Data Center at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/specific?db=hra&q=HRA000437 [3]. ..

    Article Title: Advances in spatial transcriptomics and related data analysis strategies
    Article Snippet: smHCR , 2016 , Zebrafish embryos, mouse brain , Subcellular , 5 , In situ hybridization , High sensitivity Diffraction-limited resolution , Low throughput , [ ] . .. Spatial Transcriptomics , 2016 , Adult mouse olfactory bulb , 100 μm/55 μm (10 × Genomics Visium) , Entire transcriptome , Spatial barcoding , Provides spatial information , Contains several cells in each sequencing unit , [ ] . .. Geo-seq , 2017 , Mouse early embryo, mouse brain, etc , 10 cells , > 8000 , Microdissection , Profiles transcriptomes from several cells while preserving spatial information , Low throughput , [ ] .

    Single Cell:

    Article Title: Novel cancer‐associated secretory cells and IL‐1β + macrophages as key players in early lung adenocarcinoma progression in female never‐smokers
    Article Snippet: .. Analyses included whole‐exome sequencing (WES) and whole‐transcriptome sequencing (WTS) ( n = 7), single‐cell RNA sequencing ( n = 4) and spatial transcriptomics ( n = 1, SMC‐19) (Figure ). ..

    RNA Sequencing:

    Article Title: Novel cancer‐associated secretory cells and IL‐1β + macrophages as key players in early lung adenocarcinoma progression in female never‐smokers
    Article Snippet: .. Analyses included whole‐exome sequencing (WES) and whole‐transcriptome sequencing (WTS) ( n = 7), single‐cell RNA sequencing ( n = 4) and spatial transcriptomics ( n = 1, SMC‐19) (Figure ). ..

    Article Title: Spatial omics in 3D culture model systems: decoding cellular positioning mechanisms and microenvironmental dynamics
    Article Snippet: 2025 , Smart-seq3D (scRNA + diffusion labeling) , TNBC tumor spheroids (3D culture) , Inferred radial positions of cells in spheroids via dye diffusion and Smart-seq3; identified thousands of spatially variable genes and continuous core–periphery expression gradients, capturing 3D-specific heterogeneity. , [ ] . .. 2024 , HiFi-Slide spatial RNA sequencing , BBB assembloid (PSC-derived brain + vasculature) , Achieved 3D spatial transcriptomics on a PSC-derived brain–blood-vessel assembloid; identified 12 spatial domains and colocalized cell types (e.g. ECs with GABAergic neurons, SMCs with glutamatergic neurons), recapitulating neurovascular arrangement. , [ ] . .. 2023 , MALDI-MSI (metabolomics) , Cortical brain organoid (human iPSC) , Optimized mass spec imaging of organoid sections; detected ~ 260 lipids and mapped their localization. Found lipid species enriched in neurogenic rosettes, suggesting roles in progenitor maintenance vs. differentiation. , [ ] .

    Article Title: Normal Ageing Impacts the Extent and Diversity of Neural Plasticity Induced in the Mouse Brain With Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
    Article Snippet: .. 3.1 | Spatial Transcriptomics Uncovers Cortical Region and Layer Dependent Neural Plasticity Mechanisms of Subthreshold Theta Burst rTMS in the Aged Brain To determine whether rTMS has a large gross effect on the cortex, we first used whole transcriptome bulk RNA- sequencing from dissected sensorimotor tissue (i.e., motor and somatosensory cortex dissected together) (Figure 1a). ..

    Spatial Transcriptomics:

    Article Title: Novel cancer‐associated secretory cells and IL‐1β + macrophages as key players in early lung adenocarcinoma progression in female never‐smokers
    Article Snippet: .. Analyses included whole‐exome sequencing (WES) and whole‐transcriptome sequencing (WTS) ( n = 7), single‐cell RNA sequencing ( n = 4) and spatial transcriptomics ( n = 1, SMC‐19) (Figure ). ..

    Article Title: Histone Methyltransferase SETD1B Maintains Cancer Stem Cell Niche by Regulating the Crosstalk between CD24 and Surface Adhesion Molecules in Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Article Snippet: .. Spatial Transcriptomics Spatial transcriptome sequencing data from the Genome Sequence Archive (GSA- Human: HRA000437) were accessed via the National Genomics Data Center at https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/specific?db=hra&q=HRA000437 [3]. ..

    Article Title: Spatial omics in 3D culture model systems: decoding cellular positioning mechanisms and microenvironmental dynamics
    Article Snippet: 2025 , Smart-seq3D (scRNA + diffusion labeling) , TNBC tumor spheroids (3D culture) , Inferred radial positions of cells in spheroids via dye diffusion and Smart-seq3; identified thousands of spatially variable genes and continuous core–periphery expression gradients, capturing 3D-specific heterogeneity. , [ ] . .. 2024 , HiFi-Slide spatial RNA sequencing , BBB assembloid (PSC-derived brain + vasculature) , Achieved 3D spatial transcriptomics on a PSC-derived brain–blood-vessel assembloid; identified 12 spatial domains and colocalized cell types (e.g. ECs with GABAergic neurons, SMCs with glutamatergic neurons), recapitulating neurovascular arrangement. , [ ] . .. 2023 , MALDI-MSI (metabolomics) , Cortical brain organoid (human iPSC) , Optimized mass spec imaging of organoid sections; detected ~ 260 lipids and mapped their localization. Found lipid species enriched in neurogenic rosettes, suggesting roles in progenitor maintenance vs. differentiation. , [ ] .

    other:

    Article Title: Cold and hot fibrosis define clinically distinct cardiac pathologies.
    Article Snippet: STAR+METHODS Detailed methods are provided in the online version of this paper and include the following: d KEY RESOURCES TABLE d EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND STUDY PARTICIPANT DETAILS B Mice d METHOD DETAILS B Mouse myocardial infarction B Mouse transverse aortic constriction B Pigs heart samples B Flow Cytometry B Primary mouse cardiac myofibroblast cultures B Non-human-primate cardiac fibroblasts cultures B Immunofluorescence B Histology and picro-sirius red staining B Spatial transcriptome processing (Mouse) B Pig mRNA library preparation and sequencing d QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS B Cell segmentation and quantification B Double-reporter (MAMY) mice neighborhood analysis B Fibrosis analysis B Spatial transcriptomics analysis (Mouse) B Human spatial transcriptomics Analysis B Pig Bulk-mRNA sequencing analysis B Deconvolution of bulk-mRNA sequencing B Analysis of mouse Bulk-mRNA sequencing B Analysis of mouse single-cell mRNA sequencing B Pareto analysis B NicheNet analysis B myofibroblast proliferation score B In-silico perturbations of cold fibrosis B Statistical analysis SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cels.2025.101198.

    Article Title: Senescent cells as a target for anti-aging interventions: From senolytics to immune therapies
    Article Snippet: [ , ] Whereas single-cells technologies are typically devoid of original tissue context, a recent work engaging multi-organ spatial transcriptome sequencing (stRNA-seq, spatial transcriptomics RNA sequencing) provided a panoramic multi-organ characterization of tissue senescence in aged mice and identify the aggregation of immunoglobulin G (IgG) as a marker and inducer of tissue senescence, unveiling a novel molecular target for senescence-targeted interventions.



    Similar Products

    86
    10X Genomics spatial transcriptomic sequencing
    Spatial Transcriptomic Sequencing, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/data+spatial+transcriptomic/pm41411065-283-11-14
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomic sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc geo gene expression omnibus scrna seq single cell rna sequencing strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing deg s
    Geo Gene Expression Omnibus Scrna Seq Single Cell Rna Sequencing Strna Seq Spatial Transcriptomics Rna Sequencing Deg S, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/seq+strna/pm41612289-313-28-37
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    geo gene expression omnibus scrna seq single cell rna sequencing strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing deg s - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc 557 scrna seq single cell rna sequencing 558 strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing 559 ici immune cell infiltration 560 tams tumor
    557 Scrna Seq Single Cell Rna Sequencing 558 Strna Seq Spatial Transcriptomics Rna Sequencing 559 Ici Immune Cell Infiltration 560 Tams Tumor, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/ai+cell+immune/pm41345972-345-23-30
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    557 scrna seq single cell rna sequencing 558 strna seq spatial transcriptomics rna sequencing 559 ici immune cell infiltration 560 tams tumor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics sequencing st seq
    Spatial Transcriptomics Sequencing St Seq, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/seq+st/pmc12356410-227-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics sequencing st seq - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Novogene spatial transcriptome sequencing
    (A) Schematic showing the <t>sequencing</t> chip of stereo-seq technology. (B) Visualization of the spatial <t>transcriptome</t> of the coronal brain slice containing RSG region. Scale bars, 300 μm. (C) Clustering analysis of RSG cells visualized by Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction. (D) Spatial distribution of different clusters of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in RSG. (E) Dotplot showing the Cckbr mRNA expression in different clusters of RSG glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. (F) Representative image showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Normalized fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein across the different layers of RSG. (H) Area under curve of the fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein in different layers of RSG ( n = 5). One-way ANOVA (F (3, 16) = 72.32, p < 0.0001) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001. (I) Left: representative images showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of rats in Saline SA and Heroin SA groups. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: average expression level of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of Saline SA ( n = 3) vs Heroin SA ( n = 3) rats. Mann-Whitney test, * p < 0.05. (J) Recognition and separation of different layers in RSG. Scale bars, 200 μm. (K) Heatmap showing the differential IEGs expression in RSG layer 2/3, layer 5 and layer 6. Multiple Mann-Whitney test followed by False Discovery Rate (FDR) post test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs L2/3, #### p < 0.0001 vs L6. (L) Left: schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of ZI neurons and the representative image showing the hM4Di expression in ZI. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of responses of rats in EGFP control group ( n = 10) vs hM4Di group ( n = 9). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,34) = 1.635, p = 0.2096) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (M) Left: representative images showing the expression of TH and c-fos (top) or Gad and c-fos (bottom) in ZI of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive cells in TH + or Gad + neurons in ZI of ABB group ( n = 4) vs ABA group ( n = 5). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,14) = 25.68, p < 0.001) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001, ns, no significant difference. (N) Left: representative image showing the co-localization of Cckbr and the mCherry-labeled ZI-projecting neurons in RSG layer 5. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: percentage of Cckbr + and Cckbr - cells in mCherry + neurons in RSG layer 5 ( n = 3). (O) Left: representative images showing the expression of mCherry and c-fos in RSG layer 5 of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of mCherry + c-fos + neurons in RSG layer 5 of ABB group ( n = 5) vs ABA group ( n = 3) and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in mCherry + cells in RSG layer 5 in ABA group. Unpaired t test, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. (P) Top: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , Vglut2 and mCherry in ZI, and percentage of mCherry-positive cells in Vglut2 + and Vgat + neurons in ZI ( n = 4). Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. Bottom: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , mCherry and Fos in ZI after context-induced relapse, and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in Vgat + mCherry + cells in ZI after context-induced relaspe ( n = 4). Scale bars, 100 μm and 50 μm. Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. (Q) Schematic showing the training and perfusion schedule, the viral strategy for Cckbr knockout and chemogenetic activation of RSG glutamatergic neurons and the representative image of RSG axon terminals in ZI. Scale bars, 500 μm. (R) Left: representative images showing the c-fos expression in ZI adjacent to the axon terminals of RSG glutamatergic neurons in rats of control, Cckbr knockdown and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq groups after context-induced relapse. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive neurons in ZI of rats in control ( n = 4), Cckbr knockdown ( n = 5) and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq ( n = 6) groups after context-induced relapse. One-way ANOVA (F( 2, 12) = 12.30, p < 0.01) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, ** p < 0.01, ns, no significant difference. (S) Schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of RSG Glu-Cckbr -ZI GABA circuit. (T) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 1 with clozapine injection (i.p.). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,30) = 6.145, p < 0.05) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (U) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 2 with vehicle injection. Two-way RM ANOVA (F (1,30) = 0.3091, p = 0.5824) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test. ns, no significant difference.
    Spatial Transcriptome Sequencing, supplied by Novogene, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/sequencing+spatial+transcriptome/bio_rxiv__2025__11__27__691060-307-1-7
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptome sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics sequencing data
    Investigations on SGMS2—related Cellular and Molecular Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. a Western blotting analysis of SGMS2 expression in THP—1 cells and differentiated macrophages. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. b , c Apoptosis levels of Huh7 tumor cells co—cultured with control macrophages and SGMS2—overexpressing macrophages were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). d Expression of SGMS2 in spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> <t>sequencing</t> data. e Abundance estimation of the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cell population by single—sample gene—set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). f Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images of SGMS2, CD68, CD16, CD56, and NR4A3 markers in 6 human HCC tissue samples. “Zoom macrophage” indicates the aggregation area of SGMS2—positive macrophages, and “Zoom NK cell” represents the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. The scale bar is 50 um or 20 um. g Scatter plots showing the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells between patients with high and low infiltration of SGMS2—positive macrophages. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann—Whitney U test. h Pearson correlation analysis of the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells and the density of SGMS2—positive macrophages. i Kaplan—Meier analysis of OS, RFS, and early RFS in HCC patients with different infiltration densities of SGMS2—positive macrophages and CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. Survival distributions were compared using the log—rank test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns indicates no significant difference
    Spatial Transcriptomics Sequencing Data, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/data+sequencing+spatial+transcriptomics/pmc12763894-100-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics sequencing data - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc endometrial organoids • method details ○ spatial transcriptomics sequencing
    Investigations on SGMS2—related Cellular and Molecular Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. a Western blotting analysis of SGMS2 expression in THP—1 cells and differentiated macrophages. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. b , c Apoptosis levels of Huh7 tumor cells co—cultured with control macrophages and SGMS2—overexpressing macrophages were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). d Expression of SGMS2 in spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> <t>sequencing</t> data. e Abundance estimation of the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cell population by single—sample gene—set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). f Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images of SGMS2, CD68, CD16, CD56, and NR4A3 markers in 6 human HCC tissue samples. “Zoom macrophage” indicates the aggregation area of SGMS2—positive macrophages, and “Zoom NK cell” represents the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. The scale bar is 50 um or 20 um. g Scatter plots showing the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells between patients with high and low infiltration of SGMS2—positive macrophages. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann—Whitney U test. h Pearson correlation analysis of the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells and the density of SGMS2—positive macrophages. i Kaplan—Meier analysis of OS, RFS, and early RFS in HCC patients with different infiltration densities of SGMS2—positive macrophages and CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. Survival distributions were compared using the log—rank test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns indicates no significant difference
    Endometrial Organoids • Method Details ○ Spatial Transcriptomics Sequencing, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/sequencing+spatial+transcriptomics/pm41270735-266-47-53
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    endometrial organoids • method details ○ spatial transcriptomics sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Spatial Transcriptomics Inc spatial transcriptomics sequencing
    Investigations on SGMS2—related Cellular and Molecular Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. a Western blotting analysis of SGMS2 expression in THP—1 cells and differentiated macrophages. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. b , c Apoptosis levels of Huh7 tumor cells co—cultured with control macrophages and SGMS2—overexpressing macrophages were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). d Expression of SGMS2 in spatial <t>transcriptomics</t> <t>sequencing</t> data. e Abundance estimation of the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cell population by single—sample gene—set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). f Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images of SGMS2, CD68, CD16, CD56, and NR4A3 markers in 6 human HCC tissue samples. “Zoom macrophage” indicates the aggregation area of SGMS2—positive macrophages, and “Zoom NK cell” represents the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. The scale bar is 50 um or 20 um. g Scatter plots showing the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells between patients with high and low infiltration of SGMS2—positive macrophages. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann—Whitney U test. h Pearson correlation analysis of the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells and the density of SGMS2—positive macrophages. i Kaplan—Meier analysis of OS, RFS, and early RFS in HCC patients with different infiltration densities of SGMS2—positive macrophages and CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. Survival distributions were compared using the log—rank test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns indicates no significant difference
    Spatial Transcriptomics Sequencing, supplied by Spatial Transcriptomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/spatial+transcriptome+sequencing/sequencing+spatial+transcriptomics/pm41270735-325-0-0
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    spatial transcriptomics sequencing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Schematic showing the sequencing chip of stereo-seq technology. (B) Visualization of the spatial transcriptome of the coronal brain slice containing RSG region. Scale bars, 300 μm. (C) Clustering analysis of RSG cells visualized by Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction. (D) Spatial distribution of different clusters of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in RSG. (E) Dotplot showing the Cckbr mRNA expression in different clusters of RSG glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. (F) Representative image showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Normalized fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein across the different layers of RSG. (H) Area under curve of the fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein in different layers of RSG ( n = 5). One-way ANOVA (F (3, 16) = 72.32, p < 0.0001) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001. (I) Left: representative images showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of rats in Saline SA and Heroin SA groups. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: average expression level of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of Saline SA ( n = 3) vs Heroin SA ( n = 3) rats. Mann-Whitney test, * p < 0.05. (J) Recognition and separation of different layers in RSG. Scale bars, 200 μm. (K) Heatmap showing the differential IEGs expression in RSG layer 2/3, layer 5 and layer 6. Multiple Mann-Whitney test followed by False Discovery Rate (FDR) post test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs L2/3, #### p < 0.0001 vs L6. (L) Left: schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of ZI neurons and the representative image showing the hM4Di expression in ZI. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of responses of rats in EGFP control group ( n = 10) vs hM4Di group ( n = 9). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,34) = 1.635, p = 0.2096) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (M) Left: representative images showing the expression of TH and c-fos (top) or Gad and c-fos (bottom) in ZI of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive cells in TH + or Gad + neurons in ZI of ABB group ( n = 4) vs ABA group ( n = 5). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,14) = 25.68, p < 0.001) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001, ns, no significant difference. (N) Left: representative image showing the co-localization of Cckbr and the mCherry-labeled ZI-projecting neurons in RSG layer 5. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: percentage of Cckbr + and Cckbr - cells in mCherry + neurons in RSG layer 5 ( n = 3). (O) Left: representative images showing the expression of mCherry and c-fos in RSG layer 5 of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of mCherry + c-fos + neurons in RSG layer 5 of ABB group ( n = 5) vs ABA group ( n = 3) and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in mCherry + cells in RSG layer 5 in ABA group. Unpaired t test, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. (P) Top: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , Vglut2 and mCherry in ZI, and percentage of mCherry-positive cells in Vglut2 + and Vgat + neurons in ZI ( n = 4). Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. Bottom: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , mCherry and Fos in ZI after context-induced relapse, and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in Vgat + mCherry + cells in ZI after context-induced relaspe ( n = 4). Scale bars, 100 μm and 50 μm. Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. (Q) Schematic showing the training and perfusion schedule, the viral strategy for Cckbr knockout and chemogenetic activation of RSG glutamatergic neurons and the representative image of RSG axon terminals in ZI. Scale bars, 500 μm. (R) Left: representative images showing the c-fos expression in ZI adjacent to the axon terminals of RSG glutamatergic neurons in rats of control, Cckbr knockdown and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq groups after context-induced relapse. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive neurons in ZI of rats in control ( n = 4), Cckbr knockdown ( n = 5) and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq ( n = 6) groups after context-induced relapse. One-way ANOVA (F( 2, 12) = 12.30, p < 0.01) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, ** p < 0.01, ns, no significant difference. (S) Schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of RSG Glu-Cckbr -ZI GABA circuit. (T) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 1 with clozapine injection (i.p.). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,30) = 6.145, p < 0.05) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (U) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 2 with vehicle injection. Two-way RM ANOVA (F (1,30) = 0.3091, p = 0.5824) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test. ns, no significant difference.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: A non-canonical top-down pathway regulating relapse to opioid

    doi: 10.1101/2025.11.27.691060

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic showing the sequencing chip of stereo-seq technology. (B) Visualization of the spatial transcriptome of the coronal brain slice containing RSG region. Scale bars, 300 μm. (C) Clustering analysis of RSG cells visualized by Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) dimensional reduction. (D) Spatial distribution of different clusters of glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons in RSG. (E) Dotplot showing the Cckbr mRNA expression in different clusters of RSG glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons. (F) Representative image showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG. Scale bars, 100 μm. (G) Normalized fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein across the different layers of RSG. (H) Area under curve of the fluorescence intensity of Cckbr protein in different layers of RSG ( n = 5). One-way ANOVA (F (3, 16) = 72.32, p < 0.0001) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001. (I) Left: representative images showing the expression of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of rats in Saline SA and Heroin SA groups. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: average expression level of Cckbr protein in RSG layer 5 of Saline SA ( n = 3) vs Heroin SA ( n = 3) rats. Mann-Whitney test, * p < 0.05. (J) Recognition and separation of different layers in RSG. Scale bars, 200 μm. (K) Heatmap showing the differential IEGs expression in RSG layer 2/3, layer 5 and layer 6. Multiple Mann-Whitney test followed by False Discovery Rate (FDR) post test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001 vs L2/3, #### p < 0.0001 vs L6. (L) Left: schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of ZI neurons and the representative image showing the hM4Di expression in ZI. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of responses of rats in EGFP control group ( n = 10) vs hM4Di group ( n = 9). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,34) = 1.635, p = 0.2096) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (M) Left: representative images showing the expression of TH and c-fos (top) or Gad and c-fos (bottom) in ZI of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 100 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive cells in TH + or Gad + neurons in ZI of ABB group ( n = 4) vs ABA group ( n = 5). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,14) = 25.68, p < 0.001) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, **** p < 0.0001, ns, no significant difference. (N) Left: representative image showing the co-localization of Cckbr and the mCherry-labeled ZI-projecting neurons in RSG layer 5. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: percentage of Cckbr + and Cckbr - cells in mCherry + neurons in RSG layer 5 ( n = 3). (O) Left: representative images showing the expression of mCherry and c-fos in RSG layer 5 of rats in ABB group and ABA group. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of mCherry + c-fos + neurons in RSG layer 5 of ABB group ( n = 5) vs ABA group ( n = 3) and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in mCherry + cells in RSG layer 5 in ABA group. Unpaired t test, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001. (P) Top: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , Vglut2 and mCherry in ZI, and percentage of mCherry-positive cells in Vglut2 + and Vgat + neurons in ZI ( n = 4). Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. Bottom: representative images showing the co-localization of Vgat , mCherry and Fos in ZI after context-induced relapse, and percentage of Fos + and Fos - nuclei in Vgat + mCherry + cells in ZI after context-induced relaspe ( n = 4). Scale bars, 100 μm and 50 μm. Unpaired t test, **** p < 0.0001. (Q) Schematic showing the training and perfusion schedule, the viral strategy for Cckbr knockout and chemogenetic activation of RSG glutamatergic neurons and the representative image of RSG axon terminals in ZI. Scale bars, 500 μm. (R) Left: representative images showing the c-fos expression in ZI adjacent to the axon terminals of RSG glutamatergic neurons in rats of control, Cckbr knockdown and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq groups after context-induced relapse. Scale bars, 50 μm. Right: number of c-fos-positive neurons in ZI of rats in control ( n = 4), Cckbr knockdown ( n = 5) and Cckbr knockdown with hM3Dq ( n = 6) groups after context-induced relapse. One-way ANOVA (F( 2, 12) = 12.30, p < 0.01) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test, ** p < 0.01, ns, no significant difference. (S) Schematic of the viral strategy for chemogenetic inhibition of RSG Glu-Cckbr -ZI GABA circuit. (T) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 1 with clozapine injection (i.p.). Two-way ANOVA (F (1,30) = 6.145, p < 0.05) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. (U) Number of responses in mCherry control group ( n = 8) and hM4Di group ( n = 9) during test 2 with vehicle injection. Two-way RM ANOVA (F (1,30) = 0.3091, p = 0.5824) followed by Sidak’s post hoc test. ns, no significant difference.

    Article Snippet: The spatial transcriptome sequencing was conducted by Novogene Co. Ltd (Beijing, China).

    Techniques: Sequencing, Slice Preparation, Expressing, Fluorescence, Saline, MANN-WHITNEY, Inhibition, Control, Labeling, Knock-Out, Activation Assay, Knockdown, Injection

    Investigations on SGMS2—related Cellular and Molecular Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. a Western blotting analysis of SGMS2 expression in THP—1 cells and differentiated macrophages. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. b , c Apoptosis levels of Huh7 tumor cells co—cultured with control macrophages and SGMS2—overexpressing macrophages were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). d Expression of SGMS2 in spatial transcriptomics sequencing data. e Abundance estimation of the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cell population by single—sample gene—set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). f Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images of SGMS2, CD68, CD16, CD56, and NR4A3 markers in 6 human HCC tissue samples. “Zoom macrophage” indicates the aggregation area of SGMS2—positive macrophages, and “Zoom NK cell” represents the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. The scale bar is 50 um or 20 um. g Scatter plots showing the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells between patients with high and low infiltration of SGMS2—positive macrophages. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann—Whitney U test. h Pearson correlation analysis of the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells and the density of SGMS2—positive macrophages. i Kaplan—Meier analysis of OS, RFS, and early RFS in HCC patients with different infiltration densities of SGMS2—positive macrophages and CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. Survival distributions were compared using the log—rank test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns indicates no significant difference

    Journal: Journal of Translational Medicine

    Article Title: SGMS2+ macrophages enhance NR4A3hi NK cell infiltration to improve prognosis and PD-1 treatment efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma

    doi: 10.1186/s12967-025-07040-x

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Investigations on SGMS2—related Cellular and Molecular Interactions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. a Western blotting analysis of SGMS2 expression in THP—1 cells and differentiated macrophages. Each experiment was independently repeated three times. b , c Apoptosis levels of Huh7 tumor cells co—cultured with control macrophages and SGMS2—overexpressing macrophages were detected by flow cytometry (FCM). d Expression of SGMS2 in spatial transcriptomics sequencing data. e Abundance estimation of the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cell population by single—sample gene—set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA). f Multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) images of SGMS2, CD68, CD16, CD56, and NR4A3 markers in 6 human HCC tissue samples. “Zoom macrophage” indicates the aggregation area of SGMS2—positive macrophages, and “Zoom NK cell” represents the CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. The scale bar is 50 um or 20 um. g Scatter plots showing the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells between patients with high and low infiltration of SGMS2—positive macrophages. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann—Whitney U test. h Pearson correlation analysis of the density of CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells and the density of SGMS2—positive macrophages. i Kaplan—Meier analysis of OS, RFS, and early RFS in HCC patients with different infiltration densities of SGMS2—positive macrophages and CD56dimCD16highNR4A3high NK cells. Survival distributions were compared using the log—rank test. Statistical significance is indicated as follows: * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001; ns indicates no significant difference

    Article Snippet: Spatial transcriptomics sequencing data were obtained from http://lifeome.net/supp/livercancer-st/data.htm and analyzed using Seurat in R. Subsequently, SCTtransform normalization was performed.

    Techniques: Western Blot, Expressing, Cell Culture, Control, Flow Cytometry, Sequencing, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, MANN-WHITNEY